Quality Control & Inline Checks
OK/NOK at a glance instead of 6 pages of Word.
🏭 PRODUCTION
Complaints cost money and reputation. Most quality problems are not caused by negligence, but by unclear inspection instructions that are never at hand.
+14%
first pass yield
72→86%
in the Nortek case
24/7
inspection knowledge available
What you document: visual inspection with OK/NOK comparison photos, measurement procedures on the part (which spot, which tool), first-article inspection after setup, inline checks at critical steps - and the escalation procedure for NOK.
⚠️
The trigger - how do you recognize it?
- Complaints keep piling up even though inspection rules exist
- The inspection instruction is a 6-page Word document nobody has at hand
- First pass yield is too low
- Quality problems accumulate on night shifts and weekends
- Audit preparation takes weeks
ℹ️
How it works with GIRI
QR code at the inspection station. Comparison photos show: this is OK, this is NOK. Measurement points marked with arrows, escalation steps linked as an instruction.
💡
The value
- First pass yield +14% (Nortek case, POKA: from 72% to 86%)
- Fewer complaints through consistent inspection
- Audit readiness through documented inspection processes
- Faster training of new inspectors
💡
Typical users
- Automotive suppliers (PPAP, first article inspection)
- Medical technology (regulatory requirements)
- Precision mechanics
- Pharma & food (HACCP, GMP)
⚠️
What you want to avoid
- Inspection instructions as plain text - OK/NOK examples are visual
- Generic checklists - be specific per part instead
- "Forgetting" escalation - what happens on NOK is part of the instruction
KPI figures are industry benchmarks (POKA Nortek case, SwipeGuide), not a GIRI guarantee.
Verwandte Artikel
Machine Operation → Cleaning & 6S → Safety Training